WHO Poll
Q: 2023/24 Hopes & aspirations for this season
a. As Champions of Europe there's no reason we shouldn't be pushing for a top 7 spot & a run in the Cups
24%
  
b. Last season was a trophy winning one and there's only one way to go after that, I expect a dull mid table bore fest of a season
17%
  
c. Buy some f***ing players or we're in a battle to stay up & that's as good as it gets
18%
  
d. Moyes out
38%
  
e. New season you say, woohoo time to get the new kit and wear it it to the pub for all the big games, the wags down there call me Mr West Ham
3%
  



LeroysBoots 7:36 Sun Apr 14
Paqueta
85 million !?!

Lol, if we get that I'd piss myself

Bloke was fucking terrible today, showboating twat

Replies - Newest Posts First (Show In Chronological Order)

ludo21 6:16 Fri May 10
Re: Paqueta
It will surprise you to know that I haven't given the FA enquiry much thought... it did occur though that if the FA are taking the enquiry seriously then presumably they are looking at any text / email correspondence and potentially speaking to all of these friends and family in Brazil who are supposed to have placed bets.

Paqueta will surely have some inkling as to how the enquiry is progressing and perhaps he is aware that a verdict is coming soon. Perhaps he has an inkling that it isn't going to end well.

I have no idea but that might explain why his mind appears to have been elsewhere.



I saw your reasons as to why he should be made captain. Perfectly valid reasons but I can't see it happening myself.

Of the current squad I would probably go with Alvarez but I don't feel strongly about it atm.

Hammer and Pickle 6:05 Fri May 10
Re: Paqueta
Fair enough.

So what makes you say the FA betting investigation may be messing with his head? The rest of your post can be ignored as it completely fails to take on board the basic fact that Paqueta, like the rest of the team and so many of us are desperate to see the back of Moyes.

By the way, you can also ask me why I think he could be made captain.

ludo21 6:00 Fri May 10
Re: Paqueta
I'll answer it then... no more than most on this forum.

Why, have you recognised my genius?

goose 6:00 Fri May 10
Re: Paqueta
wants to leave
barely speaks English

yeh lets make him captain.
fuck sake.

Hammer and Pickle 5:55 Fri May 10
Re: Paqueta
Not asking you to do anything except answer the question

Lee Trundle 5:53 Fri May 10
Re: Paqueta
Paqueta as captain?

hahahaha - you never fail to live up to my expectations on football threads, Pickled.

ludo21 5:52 Fri May 10
Re: Paqueta
Do wot Pickle..

Hammer and Pickle 5:49 Fri May 10
Re: Paqueta
Do you consider yourself as knowledgeable about football ludo21?

ludo21 5:34 Fri May 10
Re: Paqueta
Perhaps the FA enquiry isn't going well and he is therefore 'not himself'.

Or perhaps he is going all out to get stupid cards in order to prove that he is a dozy cunt and therefore his behaviour is all in keeping with being a dozy cunt.

Man City aren't going to pay his 85m release clause so we probably have no option but to keep hold for now though knowing our luck he will probably receive a 12 month ban (or worse).

The fact that we seem to be targeting several attacking midfielders in the transfer window may be indicative that we are looking to replace him one way or another.

BRANDED 5:33 Fri May 10
Re: Paqueta
He loves a few fouls and diving

jfk 5:26 Fri May 10
Re: Paqueta
Scott d
Pehaps you’d like to explain why a bloke of such high regard with us lot seemed hell bent deciding to get an almost instant second yellow against Freiburg ??
Lucky he didn’t get a second and get sent off.
With such a huge upcoming semi European final .
Blokes a cunt ,earns enough should at least show a bit of discipline.
Since returning I agree most of the team have been utter shit but he’s been non existent.

Hammer and Pickle 5:19 Fri May 10
Re: Paqueta
jfk

You could ask me to explain why I think he could be made captain if he takes on the challenge. However, you shouting insults indicates you may not be ready to take any answer on board.

dealcanvey 5:16 Fri May 10
Re: Paqueta
Apparently the betting investigations with the FA are still ongoing.

If they are over I’m sure he will be off but if it is still ongoing no one is going to touch him.

jfk 5:11 Fri May 10
Re: Paqueta
*FOR THE LAST TIME
You’re off your fucking rocker.

You fucking wanker.

He’ll be off to the highest pay cheque.
Can’t for life of me think you believe otherwise

scott_d 5:01 Fri May 10
Re: Paqueta
jfk,
would ordinarily agree with you but there aren't many in the team that are making much more of an effort and looking much more interested than him.

we just rely on him allot more so we notice it.

add to the fact he's playing for a manager who has possibly lost the dressing room or completely given up this season I am tempted to give him the benefit of doubt.

the majority of that team are on holiday already, including the manager.

jfk 5:00 Fri May 10
Re: Paqueta
*your off you’re fucking rocker.

You dopey prick.

jfk 4:55 Fri May 10
Re: Paqueta
We all know he’s a huge talent but for the last few games he’s looked completely disinterested to the point he’s made absolutely no effort whatsoever.
Let’s forget all that, build a team around him and make him CAPTAIN.

You off you’re fucking rocker.

goose 10:16 Fri May 10
Re: Paqueta
Still at it I see.

Mixed in with some lazy stereotypes this time.

Hammer and Pickle 10:07 Fri May 10
Re: Paqueta
… and of course it is very much part of this white, saggy underbelly of English terrace culture to stereotype Paqueta as a “show pony”. The big clubs are circling, he gets frustrated with the gamesmanship and the officials and, with the team’s motivation as low as his, pretty much everything he tries looks shit. But the cause of the malaise is on the way out and stereotypes are cheap; they will be binned along with the plastic beer glasses and hotdog wrappers after the first decent game…

jfk 3:51 Fri May 10
Re: Paqueta
goose 12:34 Fri May 10

goose 12:34 Fri May 10
Re: Paqueta
Why are you so intent on making yourself look a fucking idiot with every post?

Page 1 - Next




Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: